Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 710
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Golubowski v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv09767
Plaintiff: Philip Golubowski
Defendant: Robinhood Markets, Inc., Vladimir Tenev, Jason Warnick and others
Petitioner: Felix Maechler, Leroy Doug Altman, Josh Raborn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant: Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
McLeod v. Innovage Holding Corp.. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02770
Plaintiff: RANDY MCLEOD
Defendant: INNOVAGE HOLDING CORP., MAUREEN HEWITT, BARBARA GUTIERREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund v. SelectQuote, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv08279
Plaintiff: West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
Defendant: SelectQuote, Inc., Timothy Danker, Raffaele Sadun and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
City of Riviera Beach General v. Macquarie Infrastructure Corpo
as 21-2524
Plaintiff: City of Riveria Beach General Employees Retirement System, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and City of Riviera Beach General Employees Retirement System, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Moab Partners, L.P.
Defendant / Appellee: Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation, James Hooke, Jay Davis and others
Hechler v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07550
Plaintiff: CORY HECHLER
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Eljon Lako v. Loandepot, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01449
Plaintiff: Eljon Lako
Defendant: LOANDEPOT, INC., ANTHONY HSIEH, PATRICK FLANAGAN and others
Petitioner: Grace Barrera, Randy Hannosh, Bernardo A. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?