Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PARKER v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING et al
as 2:2018cv01435
Defendant:
PETER WAPNER, BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LISA M. PARKER and HHM TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KILLEN v. BAYVIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04263
Defendant:
BAYVIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC.
Plaintiff:
DAWN KILLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRONSTEIN v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04223
Defendant:
MATTLEMAN, WEINROTH & MILLER, P.C., BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff:
JOLA BRONSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOCHIN v. MARKOWITZ et al
as 2:2018cv03348
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS BRANCA, LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, ANDREW MARKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kush v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
as 3:2018cv01483
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, WB General Hospital Commonwealth Health Union, The Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Kush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zurawski v. Bayview Loan Service et al
as 3:2018mc00413
Plaintiff:
Amy Zurawski
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Service and Luzerne County Sheriff's Office
PALMER v. BAYVIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01284
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PALMER
Defendant:
BAYVIEW ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARKER v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING et al
as 2:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
LISA PARKER
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, ELIZABETH BENNETT, PETER WAPNER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
