Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv04833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3568
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: In Re: David Kissi, et al
as 09-3425
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Respondent:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR.
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
FULTON FINANCIAL ADVISORS, N.A. v. BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC.
as 5:2009cv02236
Plaintiff:
FULTON FINANCIAL ADVISORS, N.A.
Defendant:
BEAR, STEARNS & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00925
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00833
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
