Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Kerchee et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2011cv00459
Defendant:
Nona Cutnose, Mark Smith, William C Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Kerchee, Jr and Deborah Sequichie-Kerchee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staats v. Cobb et al
as 5:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Shawn Nelson Staats
Defendant:
Robin Cobb, Warden of James Crabtree Correctional Center, Mike Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Porter v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
Glenn Arthur Porter
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Parker, et al
as 11-6087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, JIM REED, SHANNON REED and others
Porter v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Glenn Arthur Porter
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miskovsky, et al v. Jones, et al
as 10-6181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GROVER LEE MISKOVSKY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIM RABON, Sentence Administrator and others
Thomas v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Thomas
Defendant:
David Parker, Jim Reed, Shannon Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Frech, et al
as 10-6058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATRYNA FRECH, Health Services Administrator, DAVID PARKER, Warden, JEFF TROUTT, Doctor, JCCC and others
Defendant:
ROY ARIAN, Physician's Assistant, ROBIN LNU, Nurse, JCCC, JANET DOWLING, Deputy Warden and others
Thomas v. Parker, et al
as 09-6203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, RODNEY REDMAN, BECKY GUFFY and others
Thomas v. Guffy, et al
as 09-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BECKY GUFFY, DAVID PARKER, DEBBIE MORTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
