Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BERDINE et al
as 2:2016cv01809
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN BERDINE and MEGHAN BERDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
JACOBS-BERDINE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2011cv01162
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE JACOBS-BERDINE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BERDINE v. A&M INSULATION COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv91201
Plaintiff:
LARRY M BERDINE
Defendant:
A&M INSULATION COMPANY, AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOODSON et al v. MAGGI et al
as 2:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. GOODSON, III, DANIEL J. GOODSON, IV, JORDAN J. GOODSON and others
Defendant:
LAWRENCE O. MAGGI, DIANA IREY, J. BRACKEN BURNS, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
