Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC v. UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. and CARBONYTE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Woods v. Best Buy Stores LP
as 2:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lunette Woods, Lunette Woods and Lunette Woods
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Woods v. Best Buy Co Inc
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Lunette Woods, Lunette Woods and Lunette Woods
Defendant:
Best Buy Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Best Buy RV's, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Donald W Miller and Donald W Miller
Defendant:
Best Buy RV's, Inc., James Peifer, Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS v BEST NURSES et al
as 1:2008cv01113
Plaintiff:
LATANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
BEST NURSES TOO, INC., MARY E. HERMANN and RONALD HERMANN, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AUTO MASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. GILES AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00623
Plaintiff:
AUTO MASTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
GILES AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Z BEST CARS OF ALEXANDRIA, INC. and AUTOMOTIVE LEASING RECEIVABLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
