Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson, et al v. City of Biddeford, et al
as 23-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of her minor son B.L. and on behalf of Derrick Thompson, deceased and JOCELYNE WELCH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alivia Welch
Defendant / Appellee:
BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROGER P. BEAPURE, individually and as Chief of Biddeford Police Department and EDWARD DEXTER, individually and as an employee of the Biddeford Police Department
Defendant:
ME DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOHN E. MORRIS, individually and as the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Public Safety, JACOB WOLTERBEEK, individually and as an employee of the Biddeford Police Department and others
Ouellette v. Beaupre, et al
as 21-1135
Interested Party:
MOLLY LOVELL-KEELY, MAINELY MEDIA LLC and BENJAMIN MEIKLEJOHN
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER BEAUPRE, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and in his individual capacity and BIDDEFORD, ME
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ROLAND OUELLETTE
DONAHUE et al v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
CHIEF ROGER BEAUPPRE, CITY OF BIDDEFORD, OFFICER VICTOR PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DONAHUE, WJDEND LLC doing business as FIVE STAR AUTO SALES LLC and PATRICK DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Biddeford Police Dep't, et al
as 20-1481
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD DEXTER, individually and as an employee of the Biddeford Police Department, JACOB WOLTERBEEK, individually and as an employee of the Biddeford Police Department, BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. MORRIS, individually and as the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Public Safety and ME DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Plaintiff:
JOCELYNE WELCH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alivia Welch
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of her minor son B.L. and on behalf of Derrick Thompson, deceased
Welch v. City of Biddeford Police Dep't, et al
as 20-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER P. BEAPURE, individually and as Chef of Biddeford Police Department, BIDDEFORD, ME, JACOB WOLTERBEEK, individually and as employee of Biddeford Police Department and others
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOHN E. MORRIS, individually and as Commissioner of Maine Department of Public Safety and ME DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Plaintiff:
JOCELYNE WELCH, as personal representative of the Estate of Alivia Welch and SUSAN JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of her minor son B.L. and on behalf of Derrick Thompson, deceased
Frechette v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-2203
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT FRECHETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
BIDDEFORD, ME and ROGER BEAUPRE, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department
Ouellette v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-2069
Interested Party:
MOLLY LOVELL-KEELY, MAINELY MEDIA LLC and BENJAMIN MEIKLEJOHN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE R. OUELLETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
BIDDEFORD, ME and ROGER BEAUPRE, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and in his individual capacity
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Lauzon v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-1968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW LAUZON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER BEAUPRE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and BIDDEFORD, ME
Defendant:
STEPHEN DODD
JOHNSON et al v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al
as 2:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
SUSAN JOHNSON and DERRICK THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF BIDDEFORD, BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPONT v. BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL
as 2:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
ALINE C DUPONT
Defendant:
CITY OF BIDDEFORD, BIDDEFORD POLICE COMMISSIONER and BIDDEFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
