Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Smith v. Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Austin Garrick Smith
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners and Officer J.L. Bing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crisp v. Gwinnett County, GA Unidentified Deep State Agent(s) et al
as 1:2018cv02619
Plaintiff:
Nathan D. Crisp
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, GA Unidentified Deep State Agent(s) , S. Schunck , Unidentified Officer (likely Officer Bing) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION V BANISTER BROS FARM, et al
as 7:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
BANISTER BROS FARM, KEITH BANISTER, BANISTER BROS FARM GP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hom v. Hay et al
as 1:2016cv04014
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bing Hom
Defendant:
Jason Hay, Jeremy Duncan, Derrick Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hom v. Hay et al
as 1:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bing Hom
Defendant:
Jason Hay, Jeremy Duncan, Derrick Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marc et al v. Chang et al
as 1:2015cv01312
Plaintiff:
Wei Bing Marc , Premier Tek, Inc. and GP Lights USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Sheng-Yi Chang and Premiertek.net, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bing v. United States Of America
as 4:2015cv00002
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Bing
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
