Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BLAKE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KENNETH BLAKE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILBUR v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Defendant:
HAROLD ABBOTT, TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, DAVID ALLEN and others
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Plaintiff:
JAMES SCOTT WILBUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARWOOD v. CITY OF WATERVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
BLAKE HARWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF WATERVILLE , JOSEPH MASSEY , BRIAN GARDINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
BLAKE WHITNEY GRIMM
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCBRIDE et al v. CITY OF WESTBROOK
as 2:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCBRIDE and ANNE BLAKE
Defendant:
CITY OF WESTBROOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILKINS v. MADORE et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
BRENDA WILKINS
Defendant:
JAMES MADORE , JAMES FOSS , AARON BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIGUE et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH N VIGUE and PAULINE VIGUE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , RILEY POWER INC, W L BLAKE & CO and others
Cross_claimant:
NEW ENGLAND INSULATION COMPANY and GENERAL INSULATION COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
GENERAL INSULATION COMPANY, HINMAN CORPORATION, POWER PIPING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RICHES v. FANFAN et al
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
DUNCAN FANFAN, FREDDIE J BOOKER, RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. BLAKE
as 1:2007cv00086
Plaintiff:
HAROLD H ROWE, JR
Defendant:
CECIEL BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
