Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lowell v. Blake et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lowell
Defendant:
Chad E. Blake and Amherst, NH, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Atrium Medical Corporation
as 1:2021cv00458
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Blake Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mable Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v. USA
as 1:2020cv00533
Petitioner:
Kristina Blake
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blakely et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Charles Blakely and Cheryl Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Mable Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Furlong v. Bartlett, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2017cv00718
Defendant:
David Ainsworth, Bart's Deli, Bartlett Recreation Department and others
Interested Party:
Michael S. Askenaizer
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Furlong, III and Starbrite Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Supreme v. City of Concord, NH et al
as 1:2017cv00670
Defendant:
Eugene Blake, Concord, NH, City of, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Vermin Love Supreme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marston v. Blake
as 1:2017fp00010
Defendant:
Susan J. Blake
Plaintiff:
Ramie R. Marston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
