Cases 1 - 6 of 6
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv09427
Plaintiff:
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute doing business as San Jose Neurospine
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Material Witne:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 5:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
California Spine And Neurosurgery Institute
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California , Anthem Inc , Blue Shield of California and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Blue Cross of California Incorporated et al v. Insys Therapeutics Incorporated
as 2:2017cv02286
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross of California Incorporated , Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company , Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Roberts, et al v. United Health, et al
as 14-80128
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROBERTS, individually and as guardian for his daughter D. Roberts, J. B. W., a minor, by and through Julz W., parent and guardian ad litem, MICHAEL PARISER, Psy.D., AKA M. Pariser and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CARMEN KAVALI, M.D.
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED HEALTH, WELLPOINT, BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, DBA Anthem Blue Cross and others
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 2:2012cv07008
Defendant:
PGFC, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan, Skechers USA, Inc., Vertis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
