Cases 31 - 40 of 312
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
Edward Moses Jr Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation, Mr Freddie DeCourt and Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation
Defendant:
Murphy J. Paul, Jr., Governor John Bel Edwards, Mayor LaToya Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Farfetch Limited Securi
as 21-2752
Plaintiff:
Jeff Omdahl and Jeff Omdahl, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAM National Pension Fund and Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant / Appellee:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09319
Defendant:
ICAP Capital Markets LLC., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago and Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02858
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tera Group, Inc, Tera Advanced Technologies, LLC, TeraExchange, LLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
Putnam Bank
Consolidated Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
O'Sullivan et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff:
Sonja Ruhren, Andrew Pearcy, Jonathan F. Kuniholm and others
Defendant:
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, BNP Paribas S.A., Credit Suisse AG and others
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office (S.D.N.Y.) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
New York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00605
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
