Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sorrick v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnathan Sorrick
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Corizon Medical Services, Inc., Bon Secours Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cason v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 8:2020cv00692
Defendant:
Maryland Division Of Corrections, Corizon Health Services, Dr. Bolasi Onabajo and others
Plaintiff:
Marc S. Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Curtis v. Krishnaswamy et al
as 8:2019cv02682
Plaintiff:
Antwan Haywood Curtis
Defendant:
Bon Secours Hospital and Dr. Ashok Krishnaswamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bell v. Bon Secours Hospital
as 1:2016cv02995
Defendant:
Bon Secours Hospital
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
El-Amin et al v. Moyer et al
as 1:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
M. Abdullah El-Amin, Anthony Lloyd and Joshue Zembower
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, J. Philip Morgan, Contah Nimely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Wexford Medical Health Care Provider et al
as 8:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Brooks
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Health Care Provider, Hershberger, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Midy et al
as 1:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Robert Perkins
Defendant:
Jean A. Midy, Bon Secours Hospital and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
