Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Pyramid-BMC Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv13178
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bonner
Defendant:
Pyramid-BMC Holdings, LLC, Everest National Insurance Company and Metronorth Hotel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bonner v. Alves
as 1:2023cv11822
Plaintiff:
Omar Bonner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv40121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Wilborn v. Bonner et al
as 1:2019cv12050
Defendant:
Shelia Dupre, Tina Hurley, Tonomey Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wilborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doucette v. Treseler et al
as 1:2018cv11817
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Lucy M. Soto, Sheila Dupre and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Doucette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilborn v. Treseler et al
as 1:2017cv10858
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wilborn
Defendant:
Paul Treseler, Charlene Bonner, Tomoney Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 1:2016cv11113
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Charlene Bonner, Josh Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
