Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
Booth, Wesley Townsend and P. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
J. Booth, Deborah Alderson and Global Tel Link Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayles v. Booth et al
as 3:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Dustin Jermaine Gayles
Defendant:
Captain Booth, Captain Lucy and Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Wright
Defendant:
J. Wilson, Cap. Booth and Cap. Lucy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Wiley
as 6:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Margaret Booth
Defendant:
William Gray Wiley
Not Yet Classified:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moss v. Reed et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Stephanie Reed, Mary Jane Dolan, Ryan Zuidema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Kidd, et al.
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ja'Kai Simmons
Defendant:
LT. Kidd, Captain Lucy, Major Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thacker and Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Virginia Dep't of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Terrence Mack Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
