Cases 21 - 30 of 57
James et al v. Federal BOP et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Woodey, Chad Tyson West, Paul McNeary and others
Defendant:
Federal BOP and FMC Lexington, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2020cv00937
Petitioner:
Travis J. Barrett
Respondent:
BOP Director Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walter Mays v. Steven Merlak, et al
as 16-4030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER MAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden, F.C.I. ELKTON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR and BOP NE REGIONAL OFFICE DIRECTOR
Mays v. Merlak et al
as 4:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Walter Mays
Defendant:
S. Merlak, FCI Elkton Medical Department Administrator and BOP NE Regional Office Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Merlak et al
as 4:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Brian Carter
Defendant:
S. Merlak, FCI Elkton Medical Department Administrator and BOP NE Regional Office Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galanis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv01536
Plaintiff:
James S. Galanis
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. DOJ BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montarius Cox v. USA, et al
as 15-5642
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONTARIUS KINTE COX
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and BOP
Frye v. United States Government et al
as 5:2014cv01017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Frye, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Government, Lt. Kirkland, E. Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Eargle et al
as 1:2014cv00906
Plaintiff:
Larry Norris
Defendant:
Mr. Eargle, Mr. Chrissman, Mr. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Burgess v. BOP, et al
as 14-5379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOP, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESIGNATION SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, "DSCC" Office of Information Policy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
