Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bush v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
J. Gilley, BOP and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. USA et al
as 6:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
USA, BOP, Lt. Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Minotta Cuero v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Jose Wilber Minotta Cuero
Respondent:
Swaney and Director of BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. BOP
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harrelson v. BOP Director
as 0:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Harrelson
Respondent:
BOP Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GANDY v. BOP DIRECTOR
as 0:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Respondent:
BOP DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrick v. Paul
as 5:2021cv00193
Respondent:
Warden David Paul, FMC Lexington and BOP
Petitioner:
Michael T. Barrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James et al v. BOP et al
as 5:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, BOP and FMC Lexington, Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Stonell, William Marks and Joseph Alan James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. Federal BOP et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Woodey, Chad Tyson West, Paul McNeary and others
Defendant:
Federal BOP and FMC Lexington, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Embrey v. Sepanek et al
as 0:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
William J.R. Embrey
Defendant:
M. Sepanek, Brian Sparks, Karl Leibee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
