Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,667
DIMAGGIO v. AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC et al
as 2:2023cv03054
Defendant: BELL TEXTRON INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC, AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (AHM); and others
Plaintiff: ROCCO DIMAGGIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant: STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant: KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff: LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant: AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant: PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
NYBECK v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04428
Defendant: SUN COMPANY, INC., FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, DANA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD NYBECK and BARBARA MANN
Cross Defendant: QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS
3Rd Party Defendant: MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant: JILL SIKKELEE, individually and as personal representative of the estate of David Sikkelee, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Precision Airmotive Corporation, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORP, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, and Marvel-Schebler, a Division of Borg-Warner Corporation and others
FEND v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff: JANE FEND
Defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AURORA PUMP , BELL HELICOPTERS and others
Cross_claimant: ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION , CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AURORA PUMP , BELL HELICOPTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NYBECK v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06570
Plaintiff: RICHARD NYBECK
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC , A.O.SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cross_claimant: ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , CRANE CO. , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant: ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , A.O.SMITH CORP. , AMTICO DIVISION OF AMERICAN BILTRITE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RHOADES v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv05844
Cross Defendant: BEAZER EAST, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., LEONA V. RHOADES and others
Defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF, ARVIN MERITOR and others
Counter Claimant: BASIC, INC.
Cross Claimant: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, HONEYWELL, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND & CO. and others
Respondent: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
STORMS et al v. BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv02366
Defendant: BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FOSTER-WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: STORMS, CYANNE M. STORMS and STEPHEN J. STORMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00331
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?