Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FAIR v. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2018cv03644
Plaintiff:
CALVIN FAIR
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2017cv05110
Plaintiff:
EVERINA POWELL
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elaine Castiglione v. Scott Basen, et al
as 10-3215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELAINE CASTIGLIONE
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT BASEN, JAMES BUTLER, CATHY SHEEDY and others
In re: Elaine Castiglione
as 10-3033
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ELAINE CASTIGLIONE
Defendant - Respondent:
SCOTT BASEN, JAMES BUTLER, CATHY SHEEDY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
FREDA L. WOLFSON, U.S. District Judge
HEREDIA v. THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2009cv05966
Plaintiff:
JUAN HEREDIA
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, THE FREEHOLD BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRISTOPHER OTLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STORER et al
as 3:2009cv03238
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LEO STORER, RALPH STORER, BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
CASTIGLIONE v. BASEN, ESQ JMC et al
as 3:2009cv03043
Plaintiff:
ELAINE CASTIGLIONE
Defendant:
SCOTT BASEN, ESQ JMC, JAMES BUTLER, ESQ, CATHY SHEEDY, ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRADSHAW et al v. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2007cv01671
Plaintiff:
PAUL BRADSHAW and CHRIS SANCHEZ
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERNEST SCHRIEFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
