Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. Aarina Investments, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01073
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Lucky Food & Gas, LLC, Metro Convenience, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Outlaw Laboratory, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Diossy v. BPS Direct, LLC
as 1:2019cv00329
Defendant:
BPS Direct, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ambrus Diossy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Guada Technologies LLC v. BPS Direct, LLC
as 1:2019cv00184
Defendant:
BPS Direct, LLC
Plaintiff:
Guada Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kryptek Outdoor Group, LLC v. BPS Direct, L.L.C.
as 4:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kryptek Outdoor Group, LLC
Defendant:
BPS Direct, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. tiffanyco-schmucks.biz et al
as 0:2017cv62529
Defendant:
hauswasser.com, tcobox.com, speedscootz.de and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany (NJ) LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Location Services IP, LLC v. BPS Direct, L.L.C.
as 2:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Location Services IP, LLC
Defendant:
BPS Direct, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tapia v. BPS Direct, LLC
as 2:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raymond Tapia
Defendant:
BPS Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sipco, LLC et al v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 1:2016cv02690
Plaintiff:
SIPCO, LLC and IP Co., LLC
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co. , Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc. , Rosemount Inc and others
Mediator:
David Folsom
Counter_claimant:
Rosemount Inc , Emerson Process Management LLLP , Emerson Electric Co. and others
Counter_defendant:
IP Co., LLC and SIPCO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Retrospection Marketing LLC v. BPS DIRECT, LLC
as 2:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Retrospection Marketing LLC
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oakley, Inc. v. BP West Coast Products LLC
as 3:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
BP West Coast Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
