Cases filed in Pennsylvania
VEROSKO v. NOLAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff: DANIEL VEROSKO
Defendant: MICHAEL NOLAN, DONALD DACUS, MATT BANACCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTELLA v. CHAMBERLAIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00082
Petitioner: JHEN SCUTELLA
Respondent: D. M. CHAMBERLAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LASKARIS v. FOULK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00022
Petitioner: ANDREW PETER LASKARIS
Respondent: BRADLEY FOULK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and D. S. CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KOEHLER v. BEARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00156
Petitioner: JOHN CHARLES KOEHLER
Respondent: JEFFREY BEARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff: THOMAS L. REED, SR.
Defendant: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FOWLER v. COUNTY OF ERIE et al
as 1:2008cv00045
Plaintiff: JEREMY D. FOWLER
Defendant: COUNTY OF ERIE, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., SUPERINTENDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COOLEY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00246
Petitioner: ROMEO COOLEY
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY FOULK and SCI ALBION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. DIVECCHIO et al
as 1:2007cv00167
Plaintiff: BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD
Defendant: MARK A. DIVECCHIO, BRADLEY FOULK and A.J. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?