Cases 1 - 10 of 12
NEW YORK CITY, LOCAL 246, S.E.I.U., WELFARE BENEFITS FUND et al v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01987
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK CITY, LOCAL 246, S.E.I.U., WELFARE BENEFITS FUND , NEW YORK CITY, LOCAL 246, S.E.I.U., RETIREES WELFARE BENEFITS FUND , TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund et al v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:17-cv-02467
Plaintiff:
New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund , New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Retirees Welfare Benefits Fund , Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc. , Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz, Inc.
New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund et al v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02467
Plaintiff:
New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Welfare Benefits Fund , New York City, Local 246, S.E.I.U., Retirees Welfare Benefits Fund , Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Brown v. Brentwood School Dist.
as 2:2015cv06348
Defendant:
Brentwood School Dist.
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund , Local 237 Teamsters Retirees Benefit Fund , Local 237 Teamsters Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Zeneca Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Valentini, et al v. Eric Shinseki, et al
as 13-56887
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY VALENTINI, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, ADRIAN MARARU, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Intervenor - Appellee:
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC SHINSEKI, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs and DONNA M. BEITER, in her official capacity, Director, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Gregory Valentini, et al v. Eric Shinseki, et al
as 13-56887
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREGORY VALENTINI, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, ADRIAN MARARU, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC SHINSEKI, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs and DONNA M. BEITER, in her official capacity, Director, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Gregory Valentini v. Eric Shinseki, et al
as 13-56880
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY VALENTINI, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
Defendant:
ERIC SHINSEKI, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
Gregory Valentini v. Eric Shinseki, et al
as 13-56880
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREGORY VALENTINI, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated
Defendant:
ERIC SHINSEKI, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
Gregory Valentini et al v. Eric Shinseki et al
as 2:2011cv04846
Plaintiff:
Gregory Valentini, Adrian Mararu, Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
Santa Monica City of
Defendant:
Eric Shinseki and Donna M Beiter
Amicus Curiae:
Metabolic, Studio LLC
Intervenor:
Regents of University of California and Brentwood School
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gail Killefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
