Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Mark Reichel, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00261
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson
Zarkevics et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Baloh, Joshua Dreisbach, Jonathan Burrell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00503
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christenson et al v. Coki Services Corporation et al
as 0:2012cv02202
Plaintiff:
Bob Christenson , Brian Johnson and Anthony Hunt
Defendant:
Coki Services Corporation , Sylvia Matijasevich and Mark Matijasevich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
as 0:2012cv00806
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson
Defendant:
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender Pride/Twin Cities v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
as 0:2010cv02579
Plaintiff:
Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender Pride/Twin Cities
Defendant:
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
Movant:
Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
