Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pierce v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
BRIAN P. PIERCE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutton v. WeatherSeal Home Services Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02430
Defendant:
WeatherSeal Home Services Inc., John B Connor and John B. Conner
Plaintiff:
Brian P. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lenarz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv01542
Plaintiff:
Brian P. Lenarz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Catudal v. Sturgill, et al.,
as 2:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Chance Catudal
Defendant:
Michael L. Sturgill , The Groveport Police Department , Unknown Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kollin v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2011cv02605
Plaintiff:
Richard Kollin, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Cleveland Police Department , Michael McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. J & J Masonry, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00465
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
J & J Masonry, Inc. and Brian P. Watts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Beane v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 1:2008wf17494
Plaintiff:
Brian P Beane
Defendant:
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Airco/The BOC Group, Inc., Hobart Brothers Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schlegel v. Lee et al
as 3:2007cv03001
Plaintiff:
Brian P Schlegel and Brian P Schlegel
Defendant:
Kwon Che Lee, Linda Chu Lee, MDF Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hanna v. North Central Correctional Instituttion et al
as 1:2007cv02147
Plaintiff:
Brian P. Hanna
Defendant:
North Central Correctional Instituttion, Gordan Lane, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
