Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carson v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03063
Plaintiff: Katie Fondren Carson
Defendant: Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Amanda Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridges v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff: Xavier Bridges
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00192
Plaintiff: Felecia Bridges
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bridges v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2022cv00078
Plaintiff: Latoya Bridges
Defendant: David Rodriguez and First Trucking Xtreme, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bridges v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00157
Plaintiff: Melvin Louis Bridges
Defendant: Burl Cain
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. Cain
as 5:2021cv00096
Plaintiff: Antonio Laron Bridges
Defendant: Burl Cain
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?