Cases 1 - 10 of 18
International Bridge Inc v. VIP Parcel LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
International Bridge Inc
Defendant:
VIP Parcel LLC, Snezhana Bogatin and David Bogatin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Other Contract
Cuara R. v. Post District Residences et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Post District Residences, Rescue Mission of SLC, Homeless Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Bridge Inc. v. VIP Parcel LLC
as 2:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
International Bridge Inc
Defendant:
VIP Parcel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bridge et al v. Nature's Sunshine Products
as 2:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Dymphna Baudoin, Andrea Putre Individually and on behalf of Outdoor Creation, The doing business as Herb Shop, The also known as Betsy, Ivy Bridge and others
Defendant:
Nature's Sunshine Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AVT Arizona v. Community Bridges
as 2:2020cv00454
Plaintiff:
AVT Arizona
Defendant:
Community Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yocum v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Su-Yi Yocum
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Attorney Generals Office, Sean Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chon v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tae H. Chon
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, John D. Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
Michael Caldwell, Mark Johnson, Jay Lowder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
