Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Austin v. Mathis et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Julie Austin
Defendant:
Theresa Mathis, Broderick Rogers, Oxford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, MDOC, Major Christopher Dykes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Broderick B. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Hinton et al
as 3:2013cv00644
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brian Kyle Hinton, Janel H. Turnage and Broderick Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Bridges v. Mack et al
as 3:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Broderick Rayon Bridges
Defendant:
Lawrence Mack, Tasheena Mann, Amy Schade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mccoy v. Clark et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Broderick Levar Mccoy
Defendant:
Keldric Clark, Ronald Woodall, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
Broderick Levar McCoy
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall , Ronald King , L.C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Steele
as 1:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Broderick Adams
Defendant:
Jonas Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Allen et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Broderick Allen , All Plaintiffs , Linda Allen and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Broderick Stuart Sanders
Defendant:
Richard Vaughn, Covington, McNatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00450
Plaintiff:
Larry L. McDougald
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Harrison County Sheriff's Department, George Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
