Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wilson v. Lindsey
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Broderick Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arthur, et al.
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Beth Arthur, Captain Burgess and Lindsey Broderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broderick et al v. Capital One Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hernandez, Kristina Mentone, Mark Miller and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), Amazon Web Services, Inc., Capital One Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Patterson v. Fredericksburg Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Wayne Hunnicutt, Fredericksburg Police Dept. and K L Stephenson
Plaintiff:
Broderick Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broderick-Ashburn, LLC v. Broderick Acquisition Co., LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01190
Defendant:
McGriff Insurance Services, Inc. and Broderick Acquisition Co., LLC
Plaintiff:
Broderick-Ashburn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Broderick v. Clarke
as 7:2012cv00054
Petitioner:
Michael William Broderick
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broderick v. Clarke
as 7:2012cv00064
Petitioner:
Michael William Broderick
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broderick v. Clarke
as 7:2012cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael William Broderick
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
