Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Reed v. Brandon Stubbs, et al
as 23-15386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEVOYD REED
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON STUBBS, JONATHAN RIVERA and AARON DICUS
Defendant:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, JENNIFER NASH, Associate Warden/Grievance Coordinator, KARSKY, CERT C/O and others
Harold Covert v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 22-1257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold Moses Covert
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Wendy Kelley, James Gibson and others
Defendant:
Joseph Bivens, Lt., Varner Supermax, ADC, R. Owen, Grievance Coordinator, Varner Supermax, ADC and A. Lewis, Corporal, Varner Supermax, ADC
Troy Anderson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., for the State of California, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, Warden and others
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
John Nunnally v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 16-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. NUNNALLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, DUNCAN MCLARIN, Deputy Warden, LORI DAVIS, Registered Nurse and others
Warren Oliver v. Officer Harden, et al
as 13-15158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN L. OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDEN, Officer,, BARRY REDDISH, Warden, in his own capacity, WOOD, Officer and others
Jerry Smith v. J. L. Curry, et al
as 12-11244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. CURRY, Sgt., officially and individually, P. R. BROWN, Lt., officially and individually, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Banks v. Williams, et al
as 08-60909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer, BROWN, Lt and BRUCE PEARSON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
