Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cary v. Jacobson et al
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Tierra Vanessa Cary
Defendant:
Carl H. Jacobson, Marissa K. Jacobson, Stacey Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baccus v. Boyd et al
as 4:2021cv01225
Defendant:
Paul Bryant, John Segars, Curtis Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Abigail Baccus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Federal Communicative Commission et al
as 2:2020cv03819
Defendant:
South Carolina Attorney General, United States Attorney General, IRS and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Bryant v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys et al
as 2:2020cv03037
Defendant:
Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, D.E.A./F.O.I.A., Berkeley, Charleston, Dorchester Counselor of Governments and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. US Attorney of South Carolina et al
as 2:2020cv01994
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., US Attorney of South Carolina, Governor of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. US Army Corp of Engineers et al
as 2:2020cv01815
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant
Defendant:
City of Charleston and US Army Corp of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
