Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bryant v. Chattanooga Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Bryant
Defendant:
Chattanooga Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shipley v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Nikolas Shipley
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, DARNELL BRYANT, ANDREW SERRET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trivedi et al v. Minor et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Harshal Trivedi, Gayatri Trivedi and Dilip Trivedi
Defendant:
Trey Minor, Jacob Campbell, Tull Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eady v. Bryant, et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwight Eady
Defendant:
Danny Bryant, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cooper v. Lawson et al (TV2)
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Chad Nave, Emary Bryant, Bradley County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Wade Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPeters v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
April Diane McPeters
Defendant:
Tony C Parker, Alisha Shoates James, David Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machoka v. City of Collegedale et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
David B Machoka and Agnes K Machoka
Defendant:
City of Collegedale, Kat Cooper, Jacinta Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant v. McCoig et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00475
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryant
Defendant:
Dustin McCoig, Homer Bullman , Jason Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
