Cases 11 - 20 of 2,041
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent:
KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant:
V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Jonathon Bryant
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
Hudson-Bryant v. NextGen Leads LLC
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Julius Hudson-Bryant
Defendant:
NextGen Leads LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
