Cases 11 - 20 of 199
Grayson v. Sisco et al
as 4:2023cv10847
Plaintiff:
Deandre Cornell Grayson
Defendant:
Angir Sisco, Lura Brown, Margaret Quellete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bryant M. v. Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc.
as 2:2022cv13143
Plaintiff:
Bryant M.
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. Doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Brown et al v. MGM Grand Casino
as 2:2022cv12978
Plaintiff:
Bryant Brown and Hratch Yeremian
Defendant:
MGM Grand Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.
as 4:2022cv12825
Plaintiff:
Bryant Smith
Defendant:
Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bryant v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2022cv12815
Plaintiff:
darrius bryant and Deborah Cook
Defendant:
macomb county, mitchell blount, rebecca jeruzal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Solomonson et al
as 2:2022cv12238
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bryant
Defendant:
John R. Solomonson and Unknown Kakani
Bryant v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv12236
Plaintiff:
James Bryant
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Assistant Chief Medical Officer Unknown, O'Bell Winn and others
Bryant v. Gomez et al
as 2:2022cv12169
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Bryant
Defendant:
Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco, Bobby Jo Villanueva and others
Bryant v. Taylor, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12066
Plaintiff:
Dale Bryant
Defendant:
Taylor, City of, Max Dorflinger, Aaron Layne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyndon's LLC v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2022cv11942
Plaintiff:
Lyndon's LLC
Defendant:
City of Detroit, County of Wayne, Eric Sabree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
