Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Central Valley Eden Environmental Defenders, LLC v. Building Material Distributors, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00509
Plaintiff: Central Valley Eden Environmental Defenders, LLC
Defendant: Building Material Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Xi'An Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 21-2227
Plaintiff: XI'AN METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and SHANXI PIONEER HARDWARE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Plaintiff / Appellant: BUILDING MATERIAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES and MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC.
Xi'An Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 21-2205
Plaintiff: XI'AN METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and BUILDING MATERIAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANXI PIONEER HARDWARE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES and MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC.
Teuma v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv06561
Plaintiff: Theresa Teuma
Defendant: Building Material Distributors, Inc. and Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Urethane AntiTrust Liti We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3215
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALCO INDUSTRIES, INC., ARCTIC-TEMP, INC., BELTING INDUSTRIES COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee: QUABAUG CORPORATION and ELLIOTT COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Defendant: BASF AG, BASF CORPORATION, BAYER POLYMERS, L.L.C. and others
Movant: CROSSLINK TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAWRENCE STERN, CHEMTURA CORPORATION and others
: , , and others
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Northwest Building Material and Supply Company et al
as 2:2011mc00017
Plaintiff: Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant: Northwest Building Material and Supply Company, Southport Lumber and Supply Company, Northwest Building Material of Illinois Inc and others
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Northwest Building Material and Supply Company et al
as 1:2010cv02135
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant: Northwest Building Material and Supply Company, Southport Lumber and Supply Company, Northwest Building Material of Illinois, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sweeney v. Marvin Windows, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00457
Plaintiff: Tom Sweeney, Tom Sweeney and Tom Sweeney
Defendant: Marvin Windows, Inc., Building Material Distributors, Inc., Frank (I) Marvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re: Urethan Antitrust Litig
as 08-602
Petitioner: BASF SE, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY and BASF CORPORATION
Respondent: URETHANE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, ALCO INDUSTRIES, INC., ARCTIC-TEMP, INC. and others
In re: Urethane Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2004md01616
Plaintiff: Skypark Manufacturing, LLC, Urethane Antitrust Litigation, Alco Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant: Bayer MaterialScience, LLC, BASF AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Quabaug Corporation and Elliott Company of Indianapolis, Inc.
Claimant: Jack Baumstark and Class Action Refund
Not Classified By Court: Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Johns Manville Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation and others
Petitioner: Crosslink Technology, Inc., Lawrence Stern, Chemtura Corporation and others
Interested Party: Wm. T. Burnett & Company, 3M Company, 3M France SAS and others
Material Witne: Michael D. Crowell, Charles Moeller, Buster Mann and others
Intervenor: Plaintiffs in the In re: Diisocyanates Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?