Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Fish Northwest v. Scott Rumsey, et al
as 22-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FISH NORTHWEST, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RUMSEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE and KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Fish Northwest v. Thom et al
as 2:2021cv00570
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Barry Thom, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Fish Northwest
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Dine Citizens Against Ruining, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 17-17320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, AMIGOS BRAVOS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY LLC
Protect Our Communities, et al v. Michael Black, et al
as 17-55647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION, DAVID HOGAN and NICA KNITE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BLACK, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, Department of the Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
TULE WIND, LLC and EWIIAAPAAYP BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS
Donelson, et al v. United States, et al
as 16-5174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA DONELSON, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all similarly situated persons and JOHN FRIEND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Through the Department of the Interior and its agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., CHAPARRAL ENERGY, LLC and others
Hayes v. DOI, et al
as 16-5072
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID P. HAYES, Trustee for the Paul B Hayes Family Trust, Dated April 30, 2010
Defendant - Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Defendant:
CHAPARRAL ENERGY, L.L.C.
Defendant Intervenor:
OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Hayes v. Osage Minerals, et al
as 16-5060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID P. HAYES, Trustee for the Paul B Hayes Family Trust, Dated April 30, 2010
Defendant:
CHAPARRAL ENERGY, L.L.C., DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant Intervenor - Appellant:
OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment et al v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 3:2016cv08077
Plaintiff:
Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment , San Juan Citizens Alliance , Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of Interior, United States Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv08165
Plaintiff:
El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of the Interior , United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 14-35553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, an Oregon non-profit corporation, OREGON WILD, an Oregon non-profit corporation and UMPQUA WATERSHEDS, INC., an Oregon non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
