Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Alsop v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. ALSOP
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Darnell Doss v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL LAMONT DOSS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sushovan Hussain v. Warden Allenwood FCI, et al
as 22-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSHOVAN HUSSAIN, aka Hasan Tareque
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI, DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Brian Davis, et al v. George Wigen, et al
as 21-3162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN A. DAVIS and FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, Former Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, GEO GROUP INC, DONNA MELLENDICK, Former Administrator, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch and others
Andrew Fields v. BOP, et al
as 21-2981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS
Defendant:
WARDEN BRADLEY, WARDEN A. BURGH, WARDEN DEFEBO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
