Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Martin Jonassen v. USMS, et al
as 15-1751
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KANKAKEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Yahya Lindh v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 15-1553
Plaintiff - Appellant: YAHYA (JOHN) LINDH, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official capacity
Malik El-Alamin v. Scott Moats, et al
as 14-3310
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALIK AL-MUSTAFA EL-ALAMIN
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT MOATS, Clinical Director, SATINDER RATTAN, Physicians Assistant and RICARDO RIOS, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Michael H. Hunter v. State of Indiana, et al
as 14-3228
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF INDIANA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Philip Sebolt v. BOP
as 14-2767
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Malik Al-Mustafa El-Alamin v. BOP, et al
as 14-2575
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALIK AL-MUSTAFA EL-ALAMIN
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, Corrections Officer, THOMAS WEBSTER, Doctor and others
Kevin Gore v. BOP
as 14-2440
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN M. GORE
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Ronald Williams v. Richard Schott, et al
as 14-2375
Petitioner: RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent: RICHARD W. SCHOTT, CLINT SWIFT, J. SIMMONS and others
William Harris v. BOP
as 14-2185
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Donald Hatch v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 14-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONALD J. HATCH
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, MS. BORON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?