Cases 41 - 50 of 172
Tisdale et al v. Department of Justice, et al
as 1:2017cv01801
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Tisdale
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tisdale v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv01271
Plaintiff:
Richard Tisdale
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tisdale v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017mc00038
Plaintiff:
Richard Tisdale
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Flonery v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv01068
Plaintiff:
Derrick Flonery
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons Northeast Region and Federal Correctional Institution Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Isbell v. Merlak et al
as 4:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Israel Carl Isbell
Defendant:
Steve Merlak, Federal Correctional Institution-Elkton, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Merlak et al
as 4:2016cv01344
Petitioner:
Terrence Matthews
Respondent:
S Merlak, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mosley v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2016cv01240
Plaintiff:
Elmer L. Mosley
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2016cv01219
Plaintiff:
Charles Leonard Galloway
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Northeast Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores-Villalongo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2016cv00754
Petitioner:
Jose Flores-Villalongo
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Apotosky v. Hanson et al
as 4:2015cv02491
Petitioner:
Wayne Apotosky
Respondent:
R. Hanson, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
