Cases 41 - 50 of 624
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kim v. BMT of Kentucky, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Hai Jung Emily Kim
Defendant:
BMT of Kentucky, Inc. doing business as Burger King # 19690 and Continental Western Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pandolfi v. Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Margaret PANDOLFI
Defendant:
Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC, Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC, Magic Burgers, LLC a foreign limited liability company d/b/a Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURGER KING COMPANY LLC v. Diaz et al
as 1:2023cv20592
Plaintiff:
BURGER KING COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
Eduardo E. Diaz, EYM King of Michigan, LLC and EYM King, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. BURGER KING CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv23862
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MOSLEY
Defendant:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Haro v. Creative Foods Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv05341
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Creative Foods Corporation doing business as Burger King and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Haro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
