Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Michael Edwards v. DeKalb County, Georgia, et al
as 11-15160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA, A Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia, VERNON JONES, individually and in his Official capacity as former CEO of Dekalb County, BURRELL ELLIS, individually and in his Official capacity as CEO of DeKalb County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Christopher Parks v. City of Decatur Police, et al
as 10-14498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DECATUR POLICE, DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF and BURRELL ELLIS, CEO
Christopher Parks v. Sheriff Brown, et al
as 10-14448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF THOMAS BROWN and BURRELL ELLIS, CEO
Parks et al v. City of Decatur Police et al
as 1:2010cv02633
Plaintiff:
Christopher Parks
Defendant:
City of Decatur Police, DeKalb County Sheriff and Burrell Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. Brown
as 1:2010cv02643
Plaintiff:
Christopher Parks
Defendant:
Thomas Brown and Burrell Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. DeKalb County Georgia et al
as 1:2010cv01932
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards
Defendant:
DeKalb County Georgia, Vernon Jones, Burrell Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
