Cases 1 - 10 of 22
National Association of Government Employees, Inc. v. Yellen, et al
as 23-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET LOUISE YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Treasury and JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States
Interested Party:
CHRIS BUSH, JOHN PAUL DURBIN and FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Moore-Bush
as 19-1625
Defendant / Appellee:
NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
US v. Moore-Bush
as 19-1582
Defendant / Appellee:
NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Prall v. Bush
as 10-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON BUSH
Casula v. athenahealth, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv10477
Plaintiff:
Andrea Casula
Defendant:
athenahealth, Inc., Jonathan Bush and Carl B. Byers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Prall v. Bush
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Tormu E. Prall
Defendant:
Christopher R. Bush
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garcia-Monagas, et al v. Garcia-Ramirez de Arellano, et al
as 09-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GARCIA-MONAGAS, DIEGO GARCIA-MONAGAS and GISELDA GARCIA-MONAGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ILEANA GARCIA-RAMIREZ DE ARELLANO, FREDESWINDA GARCIA-RAMIREZ DE ARELLANO, FRANK STIPES-GARCIA and others
Gomis v. Mukasey, et al
as 08-8056
Petitioner:
ANTOINE GOMIS
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, US President, RICHARD B. CHENEY, US Vice President, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, Secretary of State and others
US v. Bush
as 08-1457
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAMIAN BUSH, a/k/a Suprin, t/n Damian Dashawn Bush
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
