Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faulkner v. Bush et al
as 1:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Faulkner
Defendant:
Jonathan Bush, Johnny R. Thornton, Jr., Detective Jonathan Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nicholson v. Bush Hog, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nicholson
Defendant:
Bush Hog, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cromartie v. The Law Office of Bush and Faulk, PLLC et al(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Stacia Cromartie
Defendant:
The Law Office of Bush and Faulk, PLLC , The Law Offices of E. Peyton Faulk LLC , E. Peyton Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, La Jenna Hatcher, William H. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Bethel et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, Wanda Goodwin, Alabama DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bush v. Warrington et al
as 4:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Ann Dolores Bush
Defendant:
Vincent A Warrington and City of Pell City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wall v. Wall et al
as 2:2009cv00527
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gene Wall
Defendant:
Anita Denise Wall, John B. Bush, Sibley G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
