Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whitfield-Tibbs v. All Police Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv00283
Defendant:
All Cities I Have Been In, A Woman They Call Ruth or Mary Katherine or Catherine, All Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Virginia Whitfield-Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Morales et al
as 2:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
David J. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Stephanie Morales, George Underwood, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clowdis v. Silverman et al
as 3:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
William G. Clowdis, Jr.
Defendant:
Joel Jeremy Silverman, MCV Associated Physicians, William L. Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Zeleke v. Kerry et al
as 1:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Yosefe Yirga Zeleke
Defendant:
John Kerry, Barack Obama, Joe Bidden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bush v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Northern Neck Regional Jail and Realty Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zeleke v. Obama et al
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Yosefe Yirga Zeleke
Defendant:
Barack Obama and George W. Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
