Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2020cv00004
Defendant:
United States, John Doe, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly and N. Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Ada County, Cassia County, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von Puckett v. Bartlett et al
as 1:2018cv00432
Petitioner:
Jeremy Von Puckett
Respondent:
Butch Otter, Sandy Jones, Steve Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2018cv00309
Defendant:
Butch Otter, John Doe and State of Idaho
Plaintiff:
Nathan Benjamin Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paddock v. Otter et al
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Kim Paddock
Defendant:
Butch Otter, Robert Wechsler and Elisha Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paddock v. Otter et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kim Paddock
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Lawrence Wasden and Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00510
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Minton et al v. The State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00367
Plaintiff:
Dennis Minton
Defendant:
The State of Idaho, Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paddock v. Otter et al
as 1:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kim Paddock
Defendant:
C.L. "Butch" Otter , Lawrence Wasden , Gem County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
