Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Saiku Bah v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2120
Petitioner:
SAIKU BAH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Saiko Bah v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2282
Petitioner:
SAIKO BAH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alpha Mansaray v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2050
Petitioner:
ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alpha Mansaray v. Andrea King-Wessels
as 21-7166
Petitioner:
ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent:
ANDREA KING-WESSELS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Howard County Detention Center, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Baltimore Field Office, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Abdul Bah v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1560
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ABDUL AZIZ BAH
Bah v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2020cv00173
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Mark A. Morgan
Plaintiff:
Abdoulai Bah
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Hassan Bah v. William Barr
as 19-7653
Not Yet Classified:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, KIMBERLY ZANOTTI, in her official capacity as the Washington Field Office Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, HASSAN BAH and others
Respondent:
PAUL PERRY, in his official capacity as Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility
US v. Chennor Bah
as 19-7357
Defendant / Appellant:
CHENNOR MARLEY BAH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Chernoh Bah
as 16-6988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHERNOH AMADU BAH
US v. Mamadou Lamarana Bah
as 16-4171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAMADOU LAMARANA BAH, a/k/a Lanzo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
