Cases 11 - 20 of 23
USA v. Mamadou Bah
as 14-5178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAMADOU BAH, aka Elijah Bah, aka Bah Mamadou
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bah et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02789
Plaintiff:
Natu Bah , Diariou Diallo , Aminata Kaba and others
Defendant:
State Of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Tennessee State Board of Cosmetology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Mamadou Bah v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-4025
Petitioner:
MAMADOU SAMBA BAH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Amadou Bah v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-3592
Petitioner:
AMADOU BAH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Poland et al v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
Cathleen J Poland, Serigne Ndiaye, Derrick Davis, Sr and others
Defendant:
Americal Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (National), Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC and American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (Local)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Cathleen J. Poland et al v. Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Cathleen J Poland , Serigne Ndiaye , Derrick Davis, Sr and others
Defendant:
Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC, Michael W Laphen, American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Osman Bah v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-4437
Petitioner:
OSMAN BAH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Salimatou Bah v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3446
Petitioner:
SALIMATOU BAH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
