Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lush, Stephen v. Taylor, Christine et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Christine Lyn Taylor, Carlo Esqueda, Valerie L. Bailey-Rihn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers et al v. Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Angelina M Rogers, Etheleen Rogers and Tazzaleen Rogers
Defendant:
Roberto Carlos Guzman, Peter Gene Hernandez, Herbert Rogers Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Langlade County et al
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Tara Bailey
Defendant:
Langlade County, Justin Grones and Justin Heschke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schworck, Jesse v. Okello, Vera et al
as 3:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jesse Schworck
Defendant:
Vera Amondi Okello, Walter Stewart, Emily C. Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bontrager, Edwin v. Sauk County Register of Deeds et al
as 3:2020cv00611
Defendant:
Sauk County Register of Deeds, Brent Bailey and Sauk County Corporation Counsel
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bontrager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Ashley DiPiazza v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ashley DiPiazza
Defendant:
City of Madison, Justin Bailey and Gary Pihlaja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoaglan et al v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Estate of Craig King
Defendant:
Danielle Foster , William Golden , Sarah Kropp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. McCulloch
as 1:2010cv00955
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Bailey
Defendant:
Deborah McCulloch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raven v. MATC et al
as 3:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
Lee Raven
Defendant:
MATC and Gail F. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
