Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Farrow et al v. Grainger County, Tennessee et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Farrow , Dewey Hinds , Tyler Swanson and others
Defendant:
Grainger County, Tennessee , Mark Hipsher , Scott Layel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spann v. Carter et al
as 3:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
William A. Spann
Defendant:
Ed Carter , Mitchell Bailey , Dale Grandstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr et al v. TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Danny Carr , James Ethridge and Bailey Hankins, Jr.
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. Herron et al
as 3:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Roy Herron, J Gerard Stranch, IV, Alan Secrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Danielle M White, John No. 1 Doe and John No. 2 Doe
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Holder et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Erich Webb Bailey
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pulley v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane Pulley
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Heath Delaney and Collins Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurling et al v. City of Sunbright et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Sandra Walker Spurling , Jo Ann Henry , Machelle D Cooper and others
Defendant:
City of Sunbright, Ralph Dennis Reagan, Tony M Supeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
