Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gonzaga v. Baker Hughes Inc.
as 4:2016mc01263
Plaintiff:
Noel M Gonzaga
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Halliburton Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Halliburton Co. and Baker Hughes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Baker Petrolite Corp. et al v. S&S Chemical, LLC et al
as 4:2015mc01575
Plaintiff:
Baker Petrolite Corp. and Baker Hughes Inc.
Defendant:
S&S Chemical, LLC, Bruce Neal Stevens and SPE Wax Technologies, LLC
Movant:
TM Chemicals Limited Partnership
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
United States of America v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc., Baker Hughes Inc., BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
City of Emeryville, et al v. Elementis Pigments, et al
as 3:1999cv03719
Plaintiff:
City of Emeryville and Emeryville Redevelopment Agency
Defendant:
Elementis Pigments Inc. , Sherwin-Williams Co. , Pfizer, Inc. and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Howard F. Robinson, Jr
Intervenor:
Christopher D. Adam and Hilary A. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
BAKER HUGHES V DAVIS-LYNCH
as 01-1377
Plaintiff-Appellee:
BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC., BAKER HUGHES, INC., BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
DAVIS-LYNCH, INC., DAVIS-LYNCH, INC. and DAVIS-LYNCH, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
