Cases 11 - 20 of 25
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Boston Foodmart, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv11933
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc. , Community-Suffolk, Inc. and New England Banana Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Boston Foodmart, LLC, Andrian M Shapiro, Alex Matov and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
J. Bonafede Co., Inc. et al v. Banana Joe's Farm Stand and Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11407
Plaintiff:
J. Bonafede Co., Inc. and State Garden, Inc.
Defendant:
Banana Joe's Farm Stand and Deli, Inc. and Joseph M. Flagg
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Banana Joe's Farm Stand and Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10326
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc. and Eaton & Eustis Company
Defendant:
Banana Joe's Farm Stand and Deli, Inc. and Joseph M. Flagg
Trustee:
Leominster Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
US, et al v. La Iglesia Asamblea de Dios de
as 12-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party - Appellee:
ARLENE RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, in rep. of the C/P Giraud-Ramirez, ARLENE RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, NORTHLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
ONE RURAL LOT, identified as Finca # 5500 located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico, ONE RURAL LOT, identified as Finca #21,749 located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico, ONE RURAL LOT, Identified as Finca #5,991 Located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
LA IGLESIA ASAMBLEA DE DIOS DE HATILLO, INC.
Claimant:
FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO, GIRAUD TRUST, PLAZA DEL ROCIO DEVELOPMENT, INC., represented by Arlene Ramirez-Rodriguez and others
Interested Party:
NILDA PINEIRO, AIXA MELENDEZ-PINEIRO and ASTRID DONATE
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. et al v. Dominic V. Gandolfo, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10443
Plaintiff:
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. , Community-Suffolk, Inc. , Irving Farms Marketing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Dominic V. Gandolfo, Inc. , Constance A. Gandolfo, Michael J. Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
US v. One Rural Lot, et al
as 09-1736
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party - Appellee:
ARLENE RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, in rep. of the C/P Giraud-Ramirez, ARLENE RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, NORTHLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
FRANCISCO M. LOPEZ-ROMO and LUIS D. FLORES-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ONE RURAL LOT, identified as Finca # 5500 located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico, ONE RURAL LOT, identified as Finca #21,749 located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico, ONE RURAL LOT, Identified as Finca #5,991 Located in Barrio Pueblo, Hatillo, Puerto Rico and others
Claimant:
FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO, GIRAUD TRUST, PLAZA DEL ROCIO DEVELOPMENT, INC., represented by Arlene Ramirez-Rodriguez and others
Interested Party:
NILDA PINEIRO, AIXA MELENDEZ-PINEIRO and ASTRID DONATE
J J R DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION et al v. SANDLER BROS et al
as 2:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
J J R DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION , COMMUNITY-SUFFOLK INC , FORLIZZI AND BIMBER INC and others
Cross_claimant:
MARK A SANDLER and MARJORIE R SANDLER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pacific Fruit, Inc. v. Tropical Banana Company, Incorporated et al
as 1:2009cv10661
Defendant:
Tropical Banana Company, Incorporated, Nicholas Tasho, Sotir Sam Tasho and others
Plaintiff:
Pacific Fruit, Inc. and Pacific Fruit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. v. Tropical Banana Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv10566
Defendant:
Tropical Banana Company, Inc., Nicholas Tasho, Sotir Sam Tasho and others
Plaintiff:
Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC v. Tropical Banana Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10367
Plaintiff:
Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC, Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC and Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC
Defendant:
Tropical Banana Company, Inc., Nicholas Tasho, Sotir Sam Tasho and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
